Radial Power Spectra: Quantifying the Pi Matrix Across Scales

By James Johan Sebastian Allen — PatternFieldTheory.com   •   Last updated: 2025-10-05

Images from field ion microscopy (FIM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning tunneling / atomic force microscopy (STM/AFM) — and even full-sky maps — contain hidden structure in their frequency domain. By computing the radial power spectrum we can operationally quantify coherence, scale-coupling, and fractal-like behavior attributed in PFT™ to the Pi Matrix, from sub-nanometer lattices to sky-scale maps.

1) Pipeline — from pixels to $P(k)$

  1. Preprocess: grayscale/intensity image $I(x,y)$; remove large-scale gradients (high-pass or polynomial detrend); apply apodization (Hann/Hamming) to reduce edge leakage.
  2. Fourier transform: compute $F(k_x,k_y)=\mathcal{F}\{I(x,y)\}$ and the 2D power $P(k_x,k_y)=|F(k_x,k_y)|^2$.
  3. Radial average: bin by $k=\sqrt{k_x^2+k_y^2}$ to obtain the 1D spectrum $P(k)=\langle |F|^2\rangle_\theta$.
  4. Fit slope: on log–log axes, fit a line to $\log P$ vs. $\log k$ over a chosen inertial band to estimate the exponent $\beta$.
Definitions
Fourier power: \( P(k_x,k_y)=|F(k_x,k_y)|^2 \).
Radial spectrum: \( P(k)=\langle P(k_x,k_y)\rangle_{\theta} \) with \( k=\sqrt{k_x^2+k_y^2} \).

2) Interpreting slopes

In many textures, \(P(k)\propto k^{-\beta}\). Within PFT’s framing, steeper slopes (larger \(\beta\)) indicate stronger long-range coherence (energy concentrated at low spatial frequencies), while shallower slopes suggest more local structure.

About “fractal dimension” mappings
Different communities use different conventions. For self-affine 2D fields and surfaces, \(\beta\) relates to a Hurst-like exponent \(H\) via forms such as \( \beta \approx 2H+E \) (with \(E\) the embedding dimension used for the PSD), while “effective fractal dimension” \(D\) is defined contextually (e.g., for surfaces, \(D\approx E+1-H\)). In this article we use \(\beta\) primarily as a coherence scale index; any quoted \(D\) should state the convention and embedding explicitly.

3) Case sketches

Pre-correction halo

Early TEM/FIM images sometimes show halos/blur. PFT interprets these as a living cascade: resonance updating faster than optics can freeze. Radial spectra typically show enhanced low-$k$ power and a persistent slope.

Radial spectrum of pre-correction halo
Pre-correction halo spectrum — halos as coherent cascade, not mere noise.

Corrected lattice

With aberration correction, the motion freezes into a crisp lattice. High-$k$ power is suppressed; the radial slope flattens at the upper band — a Zeno frame snapshot in PFT language.

Radial spectrum of corrected lattice
Corrected lattice spectrum — sharp atoms with curtailed high-$k$ cascades.

Ghost / logical layer

Subtle understructures (post-processing residuals or phase-like “ghosts”) can retain scale-invariant slopes, interpreted as a guiding logical layer in PFT’s ontology.

Radial spectrum of ghost layer
Ghost-layer spectrum — scale-invariant residuals beneath atomic order.

Blurry pre-correction

Before correction, blurred cascades often show strong power across decades in \(k\), consistent with active resonance/transport.

Radial spectrum of blurry pre-correction
Blurry pre-correction spectrum — broadband coherence across scales.

4) From atoms to sky maps

The same pipeline applies to large-scale maps (e.g., full-sky intensity/polarization). While the geometry differs (spherical harmonics \(C_\ell\) versus planar \(P(k)\)), both quantify how power distributes with scale. In PFT, similar slope behaviors across domains are taken as suggestive of a common substrate (Pi Matrix) — a hypothesis to be tested with consistent masks, beams, and noise models.

5) Reproducibility checklist

  • State the image source and pixel scale (e.g., nm/pixel, arcmin/pixel).
  • Document detrending, windowing, and any deconvolution/PSF handling.
  • Publish binning scheme for \(k\) and the exact fit band used for \(\beta\).
  • Provide confidence intervals for \(\beta\) (e.g., robust linear fit in log–log, bootstrap over tiles).
  • For sky maps: report masks, beams, and convert \(C_\ell \leftrightarrow P(k)\) only with explicit approximations.

6) Compact formulas (operational)

\( F(k_x,k_y)=\mathcal{F}\{I(x,y)\}, \quad P(k_x,k_y)=|F(k_x,k_y)|^2 \)
\( P(k)=\langle P(k_x,k_y)\rangle_{\theta}, \quad P(k)\propto k^{-\beta} \)

Optional self-affinity sketch (declare convention): \( \beta \approx 2H + E \), with \(E\) the embedding used for the PSD. Use \(\beta\) as your primary reported metric unless a specific fractal-dimension convention is warranted and clearly stated.

Conclusion

Radial power spectra bridge images and mathematics. Their slopes and scale-dependence provide a compact fingerprint of coherence. In the PFT view, recurring slope behavior across domains is consistent with a universal conversion substrate (Pi Matrix), while instrument specifics (PSF, masks, windows) explain deviations. The method is simple, portable, and falsifiable.

How to Cite This Article

APA

Allen, J. J. S. (2025). Radial Power Spectra: Quantifying the Pi Matrix Across Scales. Pattern Field Theory. https://www.patternfieldtheory.com/articles/spectra-analysis/

MLA

Allen, James Johan Sebastian. "Radial Power Spectra: Quantifying the Pi Matrix Across Scales." Pattern Field Theory, 2025, https://www.patternfieldtheory.com/articles/spectra-analysis/.

Chicago

Allen, James Johan Sebastian. "Radial Power Spectra: Quantifying the Pi Matrix Across Scales." Pattern Field Theory. October 12, 2025. https://www.patternfieldtheory.com/articles/spectra-analysis/.

BibTeX

@article{allen2025pft,
  author  = {James Johan Sebastian Allen},
  title   = {Radial Power Spectra: Quantifying the Pi Matrix Across Scales},
  journal = {Pattern Field Theory},
  year    = {2025},
  url     = {https://www.patternfieldtheory.com/articles/spectra-analysis/}
}