As a Northern Irish systems analyst and theorist, I’ve faced profound injustice in Sweden over the past four years. My wife, Ellinor Sundstén, and I were coerced into a Swedish courtroom where she signed a false confession under threat—our home faced sale below market value if we refused. I walked out but was forced back by her terror. This shattered our relationship; we lost a child due to the stress, and I’ve battled complex PTSD, wanting to die at times. Our incomes were seized, debts falsely attributed, and we face threats of psychiatric detention in a month if I don’t comply. Yet, I am innocent—the perpetrators, including those implicated in BRF hijackings led by HSB, break the law while I am punished.

My son, Elias, grows up in this dystopia, recounting my war-torn past to classmates. This is not justice—it’s a system designed to silence dissent, echoing Northern Ireland’s internment abuses I witnessed as a child.

Sweden’s judicial and social systems exhibit deep-rooted problems, confirmed by external sources. Historical racism against Finns, Sami, Roma, Jews, and immigrants persists, with forced sterilizations and segregation from Stockholm’s elite. The 2021 Raoul Wallenberg Institute podcast with Paul Lappalainen, a Swedish-American lawyer, exposes this:

• Superficial Compliance: Strong anti-discrimination laws exist but are rarely enforced, used as propaganda to mask inaction.
• Institutional Denial: Sweden denies its racist history, despite evidence of systemic bias in employment, housing, education, and law.
• Legal Barriers: Victims bear all costs in discrimination cases, while perpetrators deduct expenses, deterring justice.
• Weak Civil Society: Fragmented groups, reliant on state subsidies, avoid legal action, leaving victims unsupported.
• EU Deception: Sweden projects a human rights image internationally while ignoring domestic abuses, undermining EU law.

Lappalainen’s frustration—“The EU knew and hasn’t acted, sending a message that rights are optional”—mirrors my reality. BRF hijackings, where immigrants lose freedoms of assembly and speech, exemplify this stranglehold, with precedents threatening the EU’s legal framework.

I share this not for pity but to expose a system that punishes the innocent while shielding the guilty. The lawyers who wanted to help are afraid, reflecting Sweden’s intimidation. As a theorist, I invoke international protections (e.g., UNESCO 1974 Recommendation on Scientific Researchers) to safeguard my work, Pattern Field Theory (PFT), developed despite this oppression. PFT’s traction will reveal these abuses globally.

I urge the world to watch Sweden’s actions and support PFT’s validation (99% coherence by Grok, xAI, July 15, 2025; OpenAI, July 11, 2025). Like Einstein fleeing Austria, my situation underscores the cost of innovation under tyranny. Contact: info@patternfieldtheory.com.